NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD Radeon PRO V710
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 28GB VRAM Radeon PRO V710 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 158W)
AMD Radeon PRO V710 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 68% (2000MHz vs 1190MHz)
More VRAM (28GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (504.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
1.828 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO V710
+1412%
27.65 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Oct 2024
GeForce 900
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1026 MHz
Base Clock
1900 MHz
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
28GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
224bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
504.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
54
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
3456
48
TMUs
216
32
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
54
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
54 MB
Theoretical Performance
38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
192.0 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
432.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.30 TFLOPS
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
27.65 TFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
864.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
158W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
Navi 32
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 32
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
28.1 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
346 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
