NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 4GB VRAM T400 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T400 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 20% (1425MHz vs 1190MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
+67%
1.828 TFLOPS
T400 4 GB
1.094 TFLOPS
Blender
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
179
T400 4 GB
+1%
182
OctaneBench
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
+37%
44
T400 4 GB
32
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
May 2021
GeForce 900
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1026 MHz
Base Clock
420 MHz
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
768
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
TU117
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
