Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM vs AMD FirePro W8000

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM vs AMD FirePro W8000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 OEM and 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1203MHz
AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 OEM
2.464 TFLOPS
FirePro W8000 +30%
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2016
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 900
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

937 MHz
Base Clock
-
1203 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
28
1024
Shading Units
1792
64
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

38.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
76.99 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.464 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
76.99 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM206S
GPU Name
Tahiti
950 OEM
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.2
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy