CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1188MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
688 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 90W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950
+2181%
1.825 TFLOPS
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950
VS
FirePro 2460 Multi View
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Apr 2010
GeForce 900
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1024 MHz
Base Clock
-
1188 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
1
768
Shading Units
80
48
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
38.02 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
57.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.825 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
57.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
Cedar
GM206-250-A1
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²
Board Design
90W
TDP
17W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs AMD Radeon RX 570
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs Intel Xe DG1
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs ATI Radeon HD 4890
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs AMD Radeon HD 7720 OEM
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 8 GB GDDR5X
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy