Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs ATI FirePro V3800

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs ATI FirePro V3800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1188MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
368 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 90W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 +250%
1.825 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Apr 2010
GeForce 900
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1024 MHz
Base Clock
-
1188 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
400
48
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.02 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
57.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.825 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
57.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

90W
TDP
43W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
Redwood
GM206-250-A1
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy