Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1188MHz
552 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (90W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 +240%
1.825 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Sep 2008
GeForce 900
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1024 MHz
Base Clock
-
1188 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
27
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
216
48
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB

Theoretical Performance

38.02 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
57.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.825 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
57.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GT200
GM206-250-A1
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Board Design

90W
TDP
182W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy