Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX330

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX330

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950M and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX330 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 42% (1594MHz vs 1124MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (56.06GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
Lower TDP (10W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950M +17%
1.439 TFLOPS
GeForce MX330
1.224 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Feb 2020
GeForce 900M
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

993 MHz
Base Clock
1531 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1594 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
56.06GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
3
640
Shading Units
384
40
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.50 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.26 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
19.13 GFLOPS
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1224 GFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
38.26 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GP108
N16P-GT
GPU Variant
GP108-655-A1 (N17S-G3-A1)
Maxwell
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy