Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M vs AMD FirePro W4190M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M vs AMD FirePro W4190M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 960M and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4190M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 31% (1176MHz vs 900MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4190M 's Advantages
Released 8 months late

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 960M +117%
1.505 TFLOPS
FirePro W4190M
0.691 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Nov 2015
GeForce 900M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1097 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
1176 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
384
40
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

18.82 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
47.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.505 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
47.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
Opal
N16P-GX-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy