Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M vs Intel Arc Pro A30M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M vs Intel Arc Pro A30M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 965M and 4GB VRAM Arc Pro A30M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A30M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 74% (2000MHz vs 1150MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 965M
2.355 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A30M +73%
4.096 TFLOPS
Blender
GeForce GTX 965M
133
Arc Pro A30M +184%
378
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2016
Release Date
Aug 2022
GeForce 900M
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

935 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

36.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
73.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
2.355 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
73.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206S
GPU Name
DG2-128
N16E-GR-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy