NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 965M and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1150MHz
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 965M
+6%
2.355 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition
2.209 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2016
Release Date
Oct 2012
GeForce 900M
Generation
GeForce 600M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
935 MHz
Base Clock
-
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
1536
64
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
36.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.01 GPixel/s
73.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.03 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.355 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.209 TFLOPS
73.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.03 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
122W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM206S
GPU Name
GK104
N16E-GR-A1
GPU Variant
N13E-GTX2-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
