Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M vs AMD Radeon Pro W6300M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M vs AMD Radeon Pro W6300M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 965M and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6300M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro W6300M 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 77% (2040MHz vs 1150MHz)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 965M
2.355 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6300M +33%
3.133 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2016
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 900M
Generation
Radeon Pro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

935 MHz
Base Clock
1512 MHz
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
32bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

36.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
73.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
2.355 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
73.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
25W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206S
GPU Name
Navi 24
N16E-GR-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 24
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy