Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M vs AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M vs AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 965M and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Boost Clock1150MHz
AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 965M
2.355 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition +58%
3.723 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2016
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce 900M
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

935 MHz
Base Clock
-
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

36.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.09 GPixel/s
73.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
116.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.723 TFLOPS
2.355 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.723 TFLOPS
73.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
232.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
250W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206S
GPU Name
Amethyst
N16E-GR-A1
GPU Variant
Amethyst XT
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
5 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.2
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy