Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce GTX 980M and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 78% (2010MHz vs 1127MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 980M
3.462 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +256%
12.35 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2014
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 900M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1038 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
1127 MHz
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
1536
Shading Units
3072
96
TMUs
96
64
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

72.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
108.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
3.462 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
108.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
AD107
N16E-GX-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
8.9
6.7 (6.4)
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy