CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT AGP
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT AGP
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT AGP
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM GeForce GTX TITAN X and 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1089MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.6GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2952 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX TITAN X
+3384%
6.691 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2600 XT AGP
0.192 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX TITAN X
VS
Radeon HD 2600 XT AGP
Graphics Card
Mar 2015
Release Date
Jun 2007
GeForce 900
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1089 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
336.6GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
3
3072
Shading Units
120
192
TMUs
8
96
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
104.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
209.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.400 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
6.691 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
209.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
GM200
GPU Name
RV630
GM200-400-A1
GPU Variant
RV630 XT (215CDABKA15FG)
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
601 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Board Design
250W
TDP
45W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300 SE
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X vs AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 12 GB
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X vs AMD Radeon HD 6870 X2
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X vs AMD Radeon VII
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy