Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs AMD FirePro W6150M

NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs AMD FirePro W6150M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX150 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX150 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1532MHz
AMD FirePro W6150M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (88.00GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX150
1.177 TFLOPS
FirePro W6150M +40%
1.651 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2017
Release Date
Nov 2015
GeForce MX
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1469 MHz
Base Clock
-
1532 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
88.00GB/s

Render Config

3
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
12
384
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

24.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.20 GPixel/s
36.77 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.60 GTexel/s
18.38 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1177 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.651 TFLOPS
36.77 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP108
GPU Name
Emerald
GP108-650-A1 (N17S-G1-A1)
GPU Variant
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy