Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs AMD Radeon RX 7900M

NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs AMD Radeon RX 7900M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX150 and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 7900M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX150 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 180W)
AMD Radeon RX 7900M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 36% (2090MHz vs 1532MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
4224 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX150
1.177 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7900M +3172%
38.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2017
Release Date
Oct 2023
GeForce MX
Generation
Navi Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1469 MHz
Base Clock
1825 MHz
1532 MHz
Boost Clock
2090 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

3
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
72
384
Shading Units
4608
24
TMUs
288
16
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
72
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

24.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
401.3 GPixel/s
36.77 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
601.9 GTexel/s
18.38 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
77.05 TFLOPS
1177 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
38.52 TFLOPS
36.77 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1204 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP108
GPU Name
Navi 31
GP108-650-A1 (N17S-G1-A1)
GPU Variant
Navi 31
Pascal
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
180W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy