Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX230 vs AMD Radeon R9 M385X

NVIDIA GeForce MX230 vs AMD Radeon R9 M385X

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX230 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M385X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX230 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 39% (1531MHz vs 1100MHz)
AMD Radeon R9 M385X 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX230
0.784 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M385X +151%
1.971 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2019
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce MX
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1519 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
14
256
Shading Units
896
16
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

24.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
24.50 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.60 GTexel/s
12.25 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
783.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.971 TFLOPS
24.50 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
123.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP108
GPU Name
Strato
N17S-G0-A1
GPU Variant
Strato XT
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Board Design

10W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy