NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs Intel Arc A530M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 8GB VRAM Arc A530M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 65W)
Intel Arc A530M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 25% (1300MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
Arc A530M
+401%
3.994 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2023
GeForce MX
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
937 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
1536
24
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
12
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
10W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP108B
GPU Name
DG2-256
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G12
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
74 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
