Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon Pro 575

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon Pro 575

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 575 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock1038MHz
Lower TDP (10W vs 150W)
AMD Radeon Pro 575 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (217.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 575 +463%
4.489 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2017
GeForce MX
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

937 MHz
Base Clock
-
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1695 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
217.0GB/s

Render Config

3
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
32
384
Shading Units
2048
24
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
35.07 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
140.3 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.489 TFLOPS
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.489 TFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
280.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP108B
GPU Name
Polaris 20
-
GPU Variant
Polaris 20 XL (215-0910052)
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Samsung
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Board Design

10W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy