NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD FirePro M2000
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock1038MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.06GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
Lower TDP (10W vs 33W)
AMD FirePro M2000 's Advantages
96 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
+66%
0.797 TFLOPS
FirePro M2000
0.48 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jul 2012
GeForce MX
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
937 MHz
Base Clock
-
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
480
24
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.00 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
10W
TDP
33W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP108B
GPU Name
Turks
-
GPU Variant
Turks GL
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0
