Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD FirePro M6100

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD FirePro M6100

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 2GB VRAM FirePro M6100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock1038MHz
AMD FirePro M6100 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (88.00GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
FirePro M6100 +107%
1.651 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Oct 2013
GeForce MX
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

937 MHz
Base Clock
-
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
88.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.20 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.60 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.651 TFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

10W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP108B
GPU Name
Saturn
-
GPU Variant
Saturn XT GL (216-0843006)
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy