NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 120M Mac Edition
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 256MB VRAM GeForce GT 120M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock1038MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.06GB/s vs 25.34GB/s)
352 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (10W vs 14W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
+896%
0.797 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 120M Mac Edition
0.08 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Dec 2008
GeForce MX
Generation
GeForce 100M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
937 MHz
Base Clock
-
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
792 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
25.34GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
3
SM Count
4
384
Shading Units
32
24
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.000 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
10W
TDP
14W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP108B
GPU Name
G96C
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
