Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 280M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock1038MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (10W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (60.80GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250 +113%
0.797 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 280M
0.374 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2009
GeForce MX
Generation
GeForce 200M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
MXM-IV

Clock Speeds

937 MHz
Base Clock
-
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
60.80GB/s

Render Config

3
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
128
24
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.360 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.44 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
374.5 GFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GP108B
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
N10E-GTX
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Board Design

10W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy