Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 58% (1038MHz vs 657MHz)
Lower TDP (10W vs 55W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.13GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 760M +26%
1.009 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
May 2013
GeForce MX
Generation
GeForce 700M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

937 MHz
Base Clock
628 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
657 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
64.13GB/s

Render Config

3
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.51 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.05 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1009 GFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
42.05 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP108B
GPU Name
GK106
-
GPU Variant
N14E-GL-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Board Design

10W
TDP
55W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy