Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.06GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
Lower TDP (10W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1124MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950M +80%
1.439 TFLOPS
Blender
GeForce MX250
72
GeForce GTX 950M +40%
101
OctaneBench
GeForce MX250
22
GeForce GTX 950M +22%
27
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2015
GeForce MX
Generation
GeForce 900M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

937 MHz
Base Clock
993 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
640
24
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.96 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1439 GFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.96 GFLOPS

Board Design

10W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GP108B
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
N16P-GT
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy