Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 860M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1085MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 860M +74%
1.389 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce MX250
1071
GeForce GTX 860M +7%
1149
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2014
GeForce MX
Generation
GeForce 800M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

937 MHz
Base Clock
1020 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
1085 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
640
24
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.36 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.40 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1389 GFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

10W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP108B
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
N15P-GX-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy