NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs ATI Mobility FireGL V5250
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 256MB VRAM Mobility FireGL V5250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock1038MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.06GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2007
GeForce MX
Generation
Mobility FireGL
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
937 MHz
Base Clock
-
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
350 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
-
24
TMUs
12
16
ROPs
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.400 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.400 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
10W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP108B
GPU Name
M66
-
GPU Variant
M66-P
(216BGCKC13FG)
Pascal
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
90 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
3.0
