Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock1038MHz
Lower TDP (10W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition +367%
3.723 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce MX
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

937 MHz
Base Clock
-
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
2048
24
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.09 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
116.4 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.723 TFLOPS
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.723 TFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
232.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

10W
TDP
250W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP108B
GPU Name
Amethyst
-
GPU Variant
Amethyst XT
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 3.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
5 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy