Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon RX 5500M

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon RX 5500M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 5500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 85W)
AMD Radeon RX 5500M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 58% (1645MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5500M +481%
4.632 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce MX250
1071
Radeon RX 5500M +303%
4320
Blender
GeForce MX250
72
Radeon RX 5500M +413%
370
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Oct 2019
GeForce MX
Generation
Mobility Radeon
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

937 MHz
Base Clock
1375 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
22
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
1408
24
TMUs
88
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.64 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
144.8 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
9.265 TFLOPS
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.632 TFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
289.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

10W
TDP
85W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP108B
GPU Name
Navi 14
-
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XTM
Pascal
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy