NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs Intel Arc Pro A60M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX350 and 8GB VRAM Arc Pro A60M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce MX350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 95W)
Intel Arc Pro A60M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 39% (1300MHz vs 937MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 56.06GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX350
1.199 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A60M
+344%
5.325 TFLOPS
Blender
GeForce MX350
122
Arc Pro A60M
+837%
1144
Graphics Card
Feb 2020
Release Date
Jun 2023
GeForce MX
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
747 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
937 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
56.06GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
5
SM Count
-
640
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
256
-
RT Cores
16
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
83.20 GPixel/s
29.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
166.4 GTexel/s
18.74 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.65 TFLOPS
1199 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.325 TFLOPS
37.48 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
20W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
DG2-256
GP107-670-A1
(N17S-G5-A1)
GPU Variant
ACM-G12
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
6 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
Unknown
132 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
