Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs NVIDIA GeForce 820A

NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs NVIDIA GeForce 820A

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX350 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 820A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX350 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock937MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (56.06GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
544 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 820A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 20W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX350 +302%
1.199 TFLOPS
GeForce 820A
0.298 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2020
Release Date
Mar 2014
GeForce MX
Generation
GeForce 800A
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

747 MHz
Base Clock
-
937 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
56.06GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

5
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
96
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

14.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.100 GPixel/s
29.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.40 GTexel/s
18.74 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1199 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
297.6 GFLOPS
37.48 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.80 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GF117
GP107-670-A1 (N17S-G5-A1)
GPU Variant
N15V-GM
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²

Board Design

20W
TDP
15W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.1
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy