Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3

NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX350 and 256MB VRAM GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX350 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock937MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (56.06GB/s vs 11.23GB/s)
632 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 20W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX350 +5895%
1.199 TFLOPS
GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3
0.02 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2020
Release Date
Jun 2008
GeForce MX
Generation
GeForce 9M(9000M)
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

747 MHz
Base Clock
-
937 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
56.06GB/s
Bandwidth
11.23GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
5
SM Count
1
640
Shading Units
8
32
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.116 GPixel/s
29.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.116 GTexel/s
18.74 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1199 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
37.48 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

20W
TDP
13W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
G98
GP107-670-A1 (N17S-G5-A1)
GPU Variant
G98-700-U2
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
UMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
80 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy