Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs NVIDIA GeForce 940M

NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs NVIDIA GeForce 940M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX350 and 2GB VRAM GeForce 940M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX350 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (56.06GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce 940M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 17% (1098MHz vs 937MHz)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX350 +6%
1.199 TFLOPS
GeForce 940M
1.124 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2020
Release Date
Mar 2015
GeForce MX
Generation
GeForce 900M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

747 MHz
Base Clock
1020 MHz
937 MHz
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
56.06GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
5
SM Count
-
640
Shading Units
512
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.57 GPixel/s
29.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.14 GTexel/s
18.74 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1199 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1124 GFLOPS
37.48 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.14 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GM107
GP107-670-A1 (N17S-G5-A1)
GPU Variant
N16S-GT1-KB-B
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy