NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs NVIDIA NVS 5200M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX350 and 1024MB VRAM NVS 5200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce MX350 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock937MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (56.06GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
544 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 25W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX350
+399%
1.199 TFLOPS
NVS 5200M
0.24 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2020
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce MX
Generation
NVS Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
MXM
Clock Speeds
747 MHz
Base Clock
-
937 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
56.06GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
5
SM Count
2
640
Shading Units
96
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.500 GPixel/s
29.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
18.74 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1199 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
37.48 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
20.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
GF117
GP107-670-A1
(N17S-G5-A1)
GPU Variant
N13M-NS1
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.1
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
