Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs NVIDIA RTX A4000 Max-Q

NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs NVIDIA RTX A4000 Max-Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX350 and 8GB VRAM RTX A4000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 80W)
NVIDIA RTX A4000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 49% (1395MHz vs 937MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (352.0GB/s vs 56.06GB/s)
4480 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX350
1.199 TFLOPS
RTX A4000 Max Q +1090%
14.28 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2020
Release Date
Apr 2021
GeForce MX
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

747 MHz
Base Clock
780 MHz
937 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
56.06GB/s
Bandwidth
352.0GB/s

Render Config

5
SM Count
40
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
5120
32
TMUs
160
16
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

14.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
111.6 GPixel/s
29.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.2 GTexel/s
18.74 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
14.28 TFLOPS
1199 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.28 TFLOPS
37.48 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GA104
GP107-670-A1 (N17S-G5-A1)
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
14 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Board Design

20W
TDP
80W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy