Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps vs AMD FirePro W6150M

NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps vs AMD FirePro W6150M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps and 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1275MHz
128 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W6150M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (88.00GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps +38%
2.285 TFLOPS
FirePro W6150M
1.651 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2020
Release Date
Nov 2015
GeForce MX
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1035 MHz
Base Clock
-
1275 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
88.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
768
56
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

40.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.20 GPixel/s
71.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.60 GTexel/s
4.570 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.285 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.651 TFLOPS
71.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

31W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Emerald
-
GPU Variant
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy