CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps vs NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps vs NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS
VS
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps and 256MB VRAM GeForce 9200M GS to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1275MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
888 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 31W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps
+10286%
2.285 TFLOPS
GeForce 9200M GS
0.022 TFLOPS
GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps
VS
GeForce 9200M GS
Graphics Card
Aug 2020
Release Date
Jun 2008
GeForce MX
Generation
GeForce 9M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1035 MHz
Base Clock
-
1275 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
896
Shading Units
8
56
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
Theoretical Performance
40.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
71.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.200 GTexel/s
4.570 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.285 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.40 GFLOPS
71.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
G98
-
GPU Variant
NB9M-GE
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²
Board Design
31W
TDP
13W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh
2
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q
3
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps vs AMD Radeon HD 6970M
4
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max Q
5
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M
6
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps vs AMD Radeon HD 8690M
7
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps vs AMD Radeon R5 M255
8
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q
9
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
10
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps vs NVIDIA NVS 2100M
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy