Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs AMD FirePro M6000

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs AMD FirePro M6000

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and 2GB VRAM FirePro M6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1477MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M6000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 45W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile +490%
6.05 TFLOPS
FirePro M6000
1.024 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2021
Release Date
Jul 2012
GeForce 20 Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1185 MHz
Base Clock
-
1477 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
640
64
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
64
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

47.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.80 GPixel/s
94.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.00 GTexel/s
12.10 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.050 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1024 GFLOPS
189.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
64.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
43W
-
-
-
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
Heathrow
-
GPU Variant
Heathrow XT GL (216-0835033)
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.5 billion
Unknown
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy