Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2060 and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (160W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 336.0GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2060
6.451 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2 +23%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2019
Release Date
Mar 2016
GeForce 20
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1365 MHz
Base Clock
-
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
192bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

30
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
64
1920
Shading Units
4096
120
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
64
240
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
3 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

80.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
201.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
12.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.451 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
201.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
Capsaicin
TU106-200A-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
Turing
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Board Design

160W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy