NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 40% (1455MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (352.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 115W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh
+741%
6.705 TFLOPS
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh
+614%
7705
GeForce MX250
1079
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh
+1536%
3634
GeForce MX250
222
Graphics Card
Mar 2020
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 20 Mobile
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1260 MHz
Base Clock
937 MHz
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
352.0GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
36
SM Count
3
2304
Shading Units
384
144
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
16
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
93.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.61 GPixel/s
209.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.91 GTexel/s
13.41 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.46 GFLOPS
6.705 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
797.2 GFLOPS
209.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.91 GFLOPS
Board Design
115W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU106B
GPU Name
GP108B
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
