Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 vs AMD FirePro W600

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 vs AMD FirePro W600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2070 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2070 +872%
7.465 TFLOPS
FirePro W600
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2018
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 20
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
36
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
512
144
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

103.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
233.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
14.93 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.465 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
233.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
Cape Verde
TU106-400A-A1
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy