CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
VS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2070 and 1280MB VRAM GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 152.0GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 210W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2070
+468%
7.465 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
1.312 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 2070
VS
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Graphics Card
Oct 2018
Release Date
Nov 2011
GeForce 20
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1280MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
152.0GB/s
Render Config
36
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
2304
Shading Units
448
144
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
40
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
640 KB
Theoretical Performance
103.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.50 GPixel/s
233.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
40.99 GTexel/s
14.93 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.465 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1312 GFLOPS
233.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
164.0 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
GF110
TU106-400A-A1
GPU Variant
GF110-270-A1
Turing
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
3 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Board Design
175W
TDP
210W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 vs AMD Radeon RX 6600
5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2
9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 vs ATI Radeon X1700 SE
10
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 vs ATI Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy