CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max Q vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max Q vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
VS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max Q
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2080 Max Q and 256MB VRAM Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1095MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 21.92GB/s)
2824 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2080 Max Q
+4377%
6.447 TFLOPS
Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.144 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 2080 Max Q
VS
Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
Graphics Card
Jan 2019
Release Date
Jul 2007
GeForce 20 Mobile
Generation
M7x
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II
Clock Speeds
735 MHz
Base Clock
-
1095 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
685 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
21.92GB/s
Render Config
46
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
3
2944
Shading Units
120
184
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
368
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
70.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
201.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
12.89 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.447 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
201.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
TU104
GPU Name
M76
N18E-G3-A1
GPU Variant
M76 XT-M (216XJBKA13FG)
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Board Design
80W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max Q
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max Q vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 550v
3
AMD Radeon R9 M365X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max Q
4
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max Q
5
Intel Arc Pro A60M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max Q
6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX
7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M
9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max Q vs AMD Radeon HD 7610M
10
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GS
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy