CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT
VS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q
NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9700M GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock975MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (352.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
3040 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 80W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q
+5950%
5.99 TFLOPS
GeForce 9700M GT
0.099 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q
VS
GeForce 9700M GT
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Jul 2008
GeForce 20 Mobile
Generation
GeForce 9M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II
Clock Speeds
735 MHz
Base Clock
-
975 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
352.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
48
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
3072
Shading Units
32
192
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
8
384
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
187.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
11.98 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.990 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
99.20 GFLOPS
187.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
TU104
GPU Name
G96
N18E-G3R
GPU Variant
NB9E-GE
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Board Design
80W
TDP
45W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q
2
AMD Radeon R5 M430 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q
3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q vs AMD Radeon R5 M240
4
Intel Arc A530M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q
5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q
7
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q
8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q vs AMD Radeon HD 6730M
9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q vs Intel Arc A370M
10
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy