NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M OEM

VS

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M OEM

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 860M OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q 's Advantages

Released 5 years and 2 months late

More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (352.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)

2432 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M OEM 's Advantages

Boost Clock has increased by 11% (1085MHz vs 975MHz)

Lower TDP (75W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q +331%

5.99 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 860M OEM

1.389 TFLOPS

Blender

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q +2319%

2540

GeForce GTX 860M OEM

105

OctaneBench

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q +524%

206

GeForce GTX 860M OEM

33

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q

VS

GeForce GTX 860M OEM

Graphics Card

Apr 2020

Release Date

Feb 2015

GeForce 20 Mobile

Generation

GeForce 800M

Mobile

Type

Mobile

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

735 MHz

Base Clock

1020 MHz

975 MHz

Boost Clock

1085 MHz

1375 MHz

Memory Clock

1253 MHz

Memory

8GB

Memory Size

2GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR5

256bit

Memory Bus

128bit

352.0GB/s

Bandwidth

80.19GB/s

Render Config

48

SM Count

-

Compute Units

-

3072

Shading Units

640

192

TMUs

40

64

ROPs

16

384

Tensor Cores

-

48

RT Cores

-

64 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SMM)

4 MB

L2 Cache

2 MB

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

17.36 GPixel/s

187.2 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

43.40 GTexel/s

11.98 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

-

5.990 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

1389 GFLOPS

187.2 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

43.40 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU104

GPU Name

GM107

N18E-G3R

GPU Variant

N15P-GX-A1

Turing

Architecture

Maxwell

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

12 nm

Process Size

28 nm

13.6 billion

Transistors

1.87 billion

545 mm²

Die Size

148 mm²

Board Design

80W

TDP

75W

-

Suggested PSU

-

No outputs

Outputs

No outputs

None

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 (11_0)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

7.5

CUDA

5.0

6.6

Shader Model

5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q vs AMD Radeon R5 M240

2

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX

3

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M

4

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q vs AMD Radeon HD 6950M

5

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB

6

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile

7

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4330

8

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M

9

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce 800M

10

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q vs NVIDIA NVS 5100M

Related News

1

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

2

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

3

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

4

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

5

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

6

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

7

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

8

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

9

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

10

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD