NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M

VS

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 965M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q 's Advantages

Released 4 years and 3 months late

More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (352.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)

2048 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M 's Advantages

Boost Clock has increased by 18% (1150MHz vs 975MHz)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q +154%

5.99 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 965M

2.355 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q +370%

8559

GeForce GTX 965M

1819

Blender

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q +1725%

2428

GeForce GTX 965M

133

OctaneBench

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q +543%

206

GeForce GTX 965M

32

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q

VS

GeForce GTX 965M

Graphics Card

Apr 2020

Release Date

Jan 2016

GeForce 20 Mobile

Generation

GeForce 900M

Mobile

Type

Mobile

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

735 MHz

Base Clock

935 MHz

975 MHz

Boost Clock

1150 MHz

1375 MHz

Memory Clock

1253 MHz

Memory

8GB

Memory Size

2GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR5

256bit

Memory Bus

128bit

352.0GB/s

Bandwidth

80.19GB/s

Render Config

-

48

SM Count

-

3072

Shading Units

1024

192

TMUs

64

ROPs

32

384

Tensor Cores

-

48

RT Cores

-

64 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

48 KB (per SMM)

4 MB

L2 Cache

1024 KB

-

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

36.80 GPixel/s

187.2 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

73.60 GTexel/s

11.98 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

-

5.990 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

2.355 TFLOPS

187.2 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

73.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W

TDP

Unknown

-

No outputs

Outputs

Portable Device Dependent

None

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Processor

TU104

GPU Name

GM206S

N18E-G3R

GPU Variant

N16E-GR-A1

Turing

Architecture

Maxwell 2.0

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

12 nm

Process Size

28 nm

13.6 billion

Transistors

2.94 billion

545 mm²

Die Size

228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

7.5

CUDA

5.2

6.6

Shader Model

6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q vs AMD Radeon 535 Mobile

2

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q vs AMD Radeon R9 M380

3

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q vs AMD Radeon HD 8550M

4

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q

5

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M

6

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3430

7

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q vs AMD Radeon HD 6625M

8

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M

9

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q vs AMD Radeon HD 6330M

10

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q vs AMD Radeon HD 6370M

Related News

1

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

2

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

3

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

4

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

5

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

6

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

7

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

8

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

9

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

10

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!