NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 12 GB vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation

VS

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 12 GB NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 12 GB and 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 12 GB 's Advantages

Lower TDP (250W vs 300W)

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages

Boost Clock has increased by 52% (2505MHz vs 1650MHz)

More VRAM (48GB vs 12GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 768.0GB/s)

13568 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 12 GB

15.21 TFLOPS

RTX 6000 Ada Generation +498%

91.06 TFLOPS

Blender

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 12 GB

3357

RTX 6000 Ada Generation +250%

11762

OctaneBench

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 12 GB

253

RTX 6000 Ada Generation +332%

1094

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 12 GB

VS

RTX 6000 Ada Generation

Graphics Card

Oct 2022

Release Date

Dec 2022

GeForce 20

Generation

Quadro Ada

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz

Base Clock

915 MHz

1650 MHz

Boost Clock

2505 MHz

2000 MHz

Memory Clock

2500 MHz

Memory

12GB

Memory Size

48GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR6

384bit

Memory Bus

384bit

768.0GB/s

Bandwidth

960.0GB/s

Render Config

72

SM Count

142

-

Compute Units

-

4608

Shading Units

18176

288

TMUs

568

96

ROPs

192

576

Tensor Cores

568

72

RT Cores

142

64 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

6 MB

L2 Cache

96 MB

Theoretical Performance

158.4 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

481.0 GPixel/s

475.2 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

1423 GTexel/s

30.41 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

91.06 TFLOPS

15.21 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

91.06 TFLOPS

475.2 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

1423 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU102

GPU Name

AD102

TU102-350-A1

GPU Variant

AD102

Turing

Architecture

Ada Lovelace

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

12 nm

Process Size

4 nm

18.6 billion

Transistors

76.3 billion

754 mm²

Die Size

608 mm²

Board Design

250W

TDP

300W

600 W

Suggested PSU

700 W

1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C

Outputs

4x DisplayPort 1.4a

2x 8-pin

Power Connectors

1x 16-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

7.5

CUDA

8.9

6.6

Shader Model

6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 12 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

2

NVIDIA A100 PCIe vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 12 GB

3

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 12 GB

4

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 12 GB

5

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 12 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB

6

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 12 GB vs NVIDIA TITAN Xp

7

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 12 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X

8

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 12 GB vs AMD FirePro W9000

9

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 12 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce 6200 PCI

10

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 12 GB vs AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

Related News

1

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

2

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

3

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

4

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

5

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

6

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

7

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

8

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

9

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

10

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD