Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 vs AMD FirePro S9150

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 vs AMD FirePro S9150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2080 and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1710MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (215W vs 235W)
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2080 +98%
10.07 TFLOPS
FirePro S9150
5.069 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2018
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 20
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1515 MHz
Base Clock
-
1710 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
44
46
SM Count
-
2944
Shading Units
2816
184
TMUs
176
64
ROPs
64
368
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

109.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
314.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
20.14 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.07 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
314.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS

Board Design

215W
TDP
235W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU104
GPU Name
Hawaii
TU104-400A-A1
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
Turing
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy