Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs AMD FireStream 9250

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs AMD FireStream 9250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1740MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
1248 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (90W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB +612%
7.127 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jun 2008
GeForce 30
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1545 MHz
Base Clock
-
1740 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
800
64
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

55.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
111.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
7.127 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.127 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
111.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

90W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
RV770
GA107-140-A1
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy