CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
VS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1740MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (90W vs 182W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
+1229%
7.127 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
VS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Sep 2008
GeForce 30
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1545 MHz
Base Clock
-
1740 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
16
SM Count
27
-
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
216
64
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
28
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
55.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
111.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
7.127 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.127 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
111.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
GT200
GA107-140-A1
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²
Board Design
90W
TDP
182W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
3
Intel UHD Graphics 770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
4
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
5
NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile
7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs NVIDIA T600
8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs AMD Radeon HD 7970 X2
9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM
10
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 PCIe x1
Related News
1
Apple's 2025 OS in Development: iOS 19 Codename 'Luck'
2
Apple's AI is Memory Hungry! The Entire iPhone 16 Lineup Comes with 8GB RAM
3
Noctua Announce NH-D15 G2 Air Cooler and NF-A14x25r G2 Fan
4
The P-Cores and E-Cores in Arrow Lake Will Be Interleaved, Reducing Core Communication Latency and Improving Heat Dissipation
5
Changes in Intel Arrow Lake P/E Core Layout: Two Major Benefits
6
Time to Step Up, AMD and Intel! Nvidia Faces Antitrust Lawsuits in France, US, and EU
7
Intel Arrow Lake-S Features Dual Direct M.2 Slots: One PCIe 5.0 x4 and One PCIe 4.0 x4
8
AMD Ryzen 9000X3D Series to Feature Fully Unlocked Overclocking; DDR5-6400: The 'Sweet Spot' for Zen 5 Memory Speeds
9
Intel Z890 Motherboard Specs Leaked: Farewell to DDR4 Memory
10
AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Now Available for Pre-order in Europe: 9950X Priced at €660, Shipping by August 2
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy